Download “Zeng Fanzhi: Parcours” press release.
Notes to Editors
The following texts introduce the various bodies of work that will be on view in the exhibition.
Early Works
Completed during the interim of his last years at Hubei Institute of Fine Arts (1987-91) in his hometown of Wuhan, Zeng Fanzhi’s early works in oil on canvas convey the struggle of a young artist groping thematically and stylistically for forms that express the angst characteristic of that historical period. Remarkably, they also contribute to the larger discourse of figurative painting in China at the time. The pale, frenetic phantom of Parcours (1990) seemingly shrugs off the brushstrokes that compose him. Compositionally reminiscent of Francis Bacon’s Study after Velázquez’s Pope Innocent X (1953), the most sinister of these images, Agony (1990) fuses the sitter in red with his chair, rendered in long, frustrated slashes of ochre.
Xiehe Hospital
Realized in 1991 and 1992, the Xiehe Hospital series—and particularly the three triptychs with which it culminates—marks the emergence of Zeng Fanzhi’s mature style. These were completed just before his experiments in the “Meat” series, and if they share with that earlier effort a singular focus on the carnality of daily life, they add layers of social observation and rigorous composition. The two triptychs on view here contain 26 and 29 figures respectively, arrayed in configurations that evoke renaissance religious paintings, the gritty realist tableaux of Thomas Hart Benton and Thomas Eakins, and the tripartite imagistic grammar of Francis Bacon. These works, included in the landmark exhibition “China’s New Art: Post-1989” which began in Hong Kong in early 1993 and subsequently toured to Australia and throughout the United States, were instrumental for the critic Li Xianting’s formulation of his concept of “Cynical Realism.” In a seminal 1992 essay entitled “The Anomie of Current Chinese Art,” Li argued that the Xiehe paintings “have a multivalent, metaphorical nature, depicting the treatment of the ill—itself a serious matter—as a way of making a poisonous joke.” Li goes on to compare Zeng to other artists of that moment, including Wang Jinsong and Liu Wei the Elder, who were “satirizing the outside world, so their images are handled in a way that is cartoonish, theatrical, and comparatively relaxed.” For the young Zeng, realizing works of this scale and complexity, and seeing them immediately put forward for international exhibition and circulation, emboldened a nascent stylistic confidence. We see in them hints of the pictorial motifs—masks, grins, draped forms—that would mark his next phase, as well as of the expressive brushwork that characterizes his more recent efforts.
Meat
At the beginning of 1992 while still living in Wuhan, Zeng Fanzhi began producing the “Meat” series. Here, heavy, exaggerated strokes of red and white compose the fleshy bodies of individuals that appear juxtaposed with slabs of pork and beef. Within this grouping, Nativity (1992) is most akin to the “Xiehe Hospital” paintings, the naked baby and other figures forming a direct allusion to the Christian nativity scene. Zeng plays on the visual slippage between hospital patients seen lying on white sheets and raw meat strewn about a butcher shop. Here, restrained bodies relate pathologically to greater systems of power, and a dark set of emotions mixed with despair reflects the general climate of the moment. The influences of German and American expressionism are especially felt throughout these works. While exploring painterly form in his early period, Zeng often turned to Max Beckmann and the early canvases of Willem de Kooning to study their brushwork. He states, “I tried to recreate their works, deeply inspecting how each was accomplished. With each copy, I discovered more of the tiny elements that truly characterize me as an artist.”
Masks
In 1993, Zeng Fanzhi left Wuhan to join the burgeoning art scene in Beijing, and a year later started producing the iconic “Masks” series. Masks appear as crucial symbols throughout art history and across multiple cultures, from Francisco Goya’s The Burial of the Sardine (1812-19) and James Ensor’s Self-Portrait with Masks (1899), to the masks that color Chinese traditional opera. In Zeng’s works, masks perform the division between inner self and outward identity. With faces covered, the figures convey a sense of alienation, loneliness, and anxiety. Depicting figures both idle and monstrous in exaggerated, stiff postures, these works leave one feeling ill at ease. In Mask No. 6 (1996), the composition appears to parody the youthful robustness of group portraits. Sporting red neckerchiefs and squeezed into formation, the figures don nearly identical masks, each with lips twisted in a forced smile. Their oversized hands, completely out of proportion with their bodies, and stiff postures betray nothing of their hidden emotions. Shades of yellow, hazel, and brown contrast with the bright red, creating a theatrical scene of stagnation and estrangement. In Portrait (2004), the sitter is all but swallowed up by a stylish, hooded red coat and mask revealing nothing more than cold indifference. The wooden horse in the background contrasts with a sense of warm nostalgia underlain by deceit. Through elements like the red neckerchiefs, garishly colored flowers, and airplanes followed by long vapor trails, the “Masks” reflect the constrained physical and spiritual existences of their wearers, mining the impact of commodity and consumer culture on individual subjectivity.
After 2000, Zeng adopted new techniques and methods to explore the field of portraiture, attempting to highlight “line” through form and content. In We (2002), he studies the “features” of a figure’s face, painting layered sequences of spiraling lines that achieve a thick tactility. These destructive lines also give the painting a “mask” of its own and an accidental aesthetic beauty. In this period, Zeng explored an experimental language of painting that hints at future works in the “Abstract Landscapes” series.
Portraiture
Throughout his career, Zeng Fanzhi has used portraiture to pay respect to the great figures in Western art history that most deeply influenced him, as well as the friends and family who surround him on a daily basis. In two portraits of the English artist Lucian Freud, he draws separately from photographs by Cecil Beaton and David Dawson; the twinned portraits draw out Freud’s features at different stages of his life. Zeng takes the Freud in these two photographic works and places him in the empty background of the canvas, making the human image appear solitary, even emaciated. In Bacon and Meat (2008)—a portrait of Francis Bacon—Zeng embellishes the artist’s likeness with images of meat, a motif found in both their work. This inclusion becomes a way for Zeng to position himself in relation to another artist, and to discuss Bacon’s infatuation with the human body. Similarly nuanced approaches underly the artist’s self-portraits and portraits of his friends and collaborators, including collector Uli Sigg and dealer Lorenz Helbling. These sitters’ placement alone on the picure plane without anything to situate them, the clear relationship between light and shadow, and the stiff postures all vaguely elicit the sad feeling that “life is like a one-person show.”
Abstract Landscapes
Around 2002, Zeng Fanzhi first jokingly used lines to “break” already completed portraits. After this, he slowly searched for ways to create paintings completely different from those he had done before. Beginning in 2004, he officially developed a new series of “Abstract Landscapes” using pure lines to express contours that lie somewhere between physical nature and mental construct. During this period, Zeng began to incorporate visual forms drawn from traditional Chinese culture, especially classical gardens. His detailed observation of plant life deepened his comprehension of the “rhythmic vitality” found in Chinese painting. From this he developed a new set of artistic methods, using meticulously messy lines to evoke the vibrancy of life and attest to the presence of the artist’s hand and mind. He has subsequently used this method to depict everything from wild animals to heroes of Chinese Communist history.
The technical difficulty of this series lies in the question of how to allow an intricate network of abstract lines to “breathe” without being rigid, while at the same time guaranteeing their fluidity, certainty, and continuity. In order to accomplish this, Zeng makes extensive use of a “wet technique.” This technique requires precise planning as well as maintaining a balanced and efficient painting speed. Paint must be mixed so as to extend its drying time. Zeng tends to think for a long time before starting on a painting, but then to complete it in one fell swoop. He outlines an image, colors it, and then begins the long process of deconstructing it with his signature chaotic brushstrokes. Ultimately, this results in a canvas that can be seen differently depending on where one stands: from afar, an image appears clear, becoming blurred as one approaches until it disappears entirely into a flurry of line. The play between these layers of visual information makes for works that are at once abstract and figurative, impressionistic and expressionistic.
Homages
At the center of this exhibition lie a monumental group of four-meter square paintings which combine images from key moments in Western art history with Zeng Fanzhi’s signature chaotic brushstroke motif and palette. These seven works, which occupy the slender, serial walls that form the core of Tadao Ando’s design for this exhibition, are presented not in the order in which they were painted, but of the creation of the source image around which each resolves. Beginning with an image of the head of the titular figure in the ancient Roman sculpture Laocoön and His Sons whose public display marked the origins of the Vatican Museums during the Renaissance, the sequence proceeds through two paintings based on works by Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), and four based on works by Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528). These daunting compositions function less as appropriations than homages: in their intricate brushwork and mimetic prowess, we see the artist working through the Western art historical tradition, gradually reconciling this heritage, from which he has drawn lifelong inspiration, with his own mature style. Zeng’s chosen subjects are notable not only for their fame and beauty, but for a depth of layered relationships that speaks to the artist's understanding of them. The source works by Leonardo and Dürer—which encompass media including charcoal and chalk (Leonardo’s “Burlington House Cartoon,” 1500), watercolor (Dürer’s Young Hare, 1502), and pen-and-ink (Dürer’s Praying Hands, 1508), were completed between 1500 and 1521, bracketing the discovery and excavation of the Laocoön group in 1506. Sculpted in the late first century B.C., Laocoön, in its technical wizardry and idealistic vision of human beauty, inspired artists of the renaissance in the same way these renaissance masters have come to inspire Zeng. Installed here, they form a spine that runs through the exhibition, foregrounding the artist’s commitment to aesthetic research, cultivation, and ultimately innovation.
This Land So Rich in Beauty
This Land So Rich in Beauty No. 1 (2010) and This Land So Rich in Beauty No. 2 (2010) are key examples of Zeng Fanzhi’s “Abstract Landscapes,” a series on which he has been working continuously since 2006. In these, the two largest examples of that series to date, a great fire rages behind trees in the foreground, making for a sharp visual contrast between the deathly stillness that follows a blaze and the abundant life that precedes it. The title of this series is taken from a line in Mao Zedong’s 1936 poem “Snow,” later used as the title of the large landscape painting by Guan Shanyue and Fu Baoshi that has hung in the Great Hall of the People since 1959. That earlier painting, a touchstone of Chinese art after 1949, was made both in praise of their country and as an expression of the artists’ great hopes for the Chinese nation. In using a title of great historical significance, Zeng is not only incorporating his personal views and artistic principles into the landscape, he is also alluding to the ideology behind the “grand narrative” that is promoted, knowingly or otherwise, by so much artistic creation in China.
Sculpture and Still Life
Despite their extremely simple appearance, Zeng Fanzhi’s sculptures have not moved toward a purely abstract style. For example, the title In Search of Plum through Snowscape I (2014) hints at the work’s connection to plum branches and winter snow. It also reveals how the artist has borrowed from and shifted toward the subjects of traditional Chinese painting. The three pieces exhibited here were created using plant branches and mud-pouring techniques, demonstrating the integrative and systematic characteristics of Zeng’s working method. It is as if he is trying to extend the methods used in his landscape paintings into three-dimensional space, using lines to pursue the internal thoughts and bodily intentions of the subconscious. The sculptures, for all their materiality, still adhere to the lonely and hollow style found in the paintings.
The still life has offered another venue for Zeng’s artistic exploration. For example, Watermelon (2003) treats a motif previously found in the “Masks” and portraits, where it has generally appeared alongside human forms. In this intimate work of a watermelon alone, green rind and red pulp evoke symbolic meanings related to blood, politics, violence, religion, and everyday Chinese songs. In Zeng’s works, these meanings all become difficult to parse from each other. In the simple background, the artist left only faint traces of calligraphic lines of poetry, resembling those in the background of Self-Portrait (1996) and The Last Supper (2001)—since 2010, even these written cues have been erased from the series. To the viewer, it is as if there is only one slice of “pure” watermelon. Another exquisite painting of a well-worn pair of boots—evoking labor, the body, and a range of artistic predecessors from Courbet to Van Gogh—is similarly archetypal.
Works on Paper
Since 2009, Zeng Fanzhi has devoted himself to the creation of a new body of works on paper. The images in these paintings, which hover between landscape and abstraction, have three types of origins. First, while Zeng was searching the globe for hand-made paper with unique fibers, he perfected his own use of the material, creating new and unique papers with the experts of STPI, a print and papermaking studio in Singapore. There he learned to uncover visual ideas and images from inside the grain of the paper itself. Second, these paintings also originate from the artist’s continuous collection and research on traditional Chinese ink painting; he incorporates a wide range of styles, concepts, theories, and practices from different periods of ancient Chinese painting. The resulting content offers a third language: a synthesis and transformation of the many different natural landscapes that exist in the world as the images he consulted in books or coaxed from pulp serve as the background upon which to reveal the artist’s own thinking. In this way, he brings about a reconciliation between painterly perspective and visible phenomena, melding the mental with the physical, the spiritual with the scientific, and the internal with the external.